.@KennedyNation on Harvey Weinstein: "It's not about sexuality... it's about sexism and that is an extension of Leftism." @NextRevFNC pic.twitter.com/ZuL6aSMywY— Fox News (@FoxNews) October 16, 2017
Without constant firmware updates like these the reprogrammable meatbags of the Right would never be sure who they were supposed to be hating on any given day.
Behold, a Tip Jar!
7 comments:
It is also about FOX not really reporting on their own Weinstein male power structure.
And this female on FOX is paid to say this. paid Speech. Not like Free Speech. Paid speech being; a rich asshole paying a selfish, greedy asshole to say things from their mouths for the assholes that pay them.
For this FOX-ette, She has extreme Roger Ailes/ Weinstein Stockholm syndrome.
Like those big old leftists Roger Ailes and Bill OReilly!
I guess Roger Ailes and Loofah O'Liely were just so prone to being overwhelming influenced by all of us big bad old leftists that they couldn't keep it in their pants. Not their fault!!1!
Yeah, right: that's the ticket! It's all the fault of leftists, especially those damnable feminazis!!1!
Of course, Fake Noise's viewers will lap it up. That's really the point. Deflects attention from their own giant sucking stinking cesspool.
Kennedy has been this bad since she was on MTV.
When the SCOTUS ruled in favor of Citizens United.
Money is speech therefore we get some billionaires paid vessel to say what they tell them to say.
Which is not reporting. Not even honest opinion debate.
paid misleading speech to mislead.
Like make the issue(s) of a kneeling football player about everything else and why he should be scorned, tarred and feathered, fired, shunned from all of society.
Most of all, paid speech drowning out free speech. The jackboot applies more force on your neck. For others to fear.
Actually, the ruling in re Citizens United v FEC just confirmed the "money is speech" ruling they'd already made in re Buckley v Valeo, back in 1976. And that, in turn, built on the clerical interpretation, in re the infamous Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad (1886), that it was unconstitutional to deny corporations any of the rights of natural persons, particularly when it might mean enforcing the rights of natural persons who, in the immortal words of Yzma, "should have thought of that before [they] became peasants!"*
("I say to myself that the Earth is extinguished, though I never saw it lit." -- Samuel Beckett, Endgame
* The Emperor's New Groove, Walt Disney Pictures, 2000.
@NeoTuxedo Kennedy has been this bad since she was on MTV.
Kennedy was so bad that she made Kurt Loder, who was doing his best Lurch impression on that network, look hip.
Post a Comment